Beautifully written letter! However, I was more intrigued by the statements in your cover essay, specifically "a system that is completely unaffordable and incomprehensible to most Americans." That's a very serious indictment of the entire framework of our country. You might like to add "glacially slow," just to complete the picture. Later you observe that "We need to create accessible resources...," a statement that should apply to much more of the law than just free speech. The entire legal system is unapproachable and fear of any encounter prevents far too many people from pursuing their rights.
Ditto for a desperate need for better assistance for Domestic Violence and Child Custody litigants. The County is already ferociously handling Child Support - they should add Spousal Support!
People have complained about the opacity, complexity, slowness and expense of the legal system, and lawyers' perverse incentive to keep it that way, since the beginning of time.
In this specific area of free speech, are there any feasible proposals to mitigate the chilling effect of this kind of bullying?
I know you say that commenting publicly about ongoing legal proceedings can be fraught, especially for legal counsel, but the phrase "beat them incontinent with California's anti-SLAPP statute" had to be said.
Thank you for taking this case, and for publicizing it. Keep up the good fight.
As a result of this case, and Whittier's actions, I am stopping all planned donations to Whittier College, until such time as Whittier publicly apologizes, and repudiates all individuals associated with this censorious behavior.
Does this statement qualify as "conduct that undermines President Oubre’s reputation, authority and position"? Could it provoke a claim of "personal liability under the Unruh Civil Rights Act"? I will stipulate that I intend "to create a hostile work environment for President Oubre and to undermine her authority and position", although this is not my sole purpose.
Here in the Free State of Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Republican-controlled legislature are pushing an agenda to make it easier for public officials to sue for defamation. Also included is a provision that would treat anonymously sourced information as inherently false. While this is aimed at the news media, there are also proposals to apply it to bloggers and others posting online. Bloggers would be required to register with the state and to disclose the sources of any payments they might receive. BTW, those pushing these proposals have made it clear the goal is to get a case to the Supreme Court and have New York Time v. Sullivan overturned.
Your posting is important for all to read and understand. As has been said by JVL...the residents of the Free State of Florida are free to do whatever Governor DeSantis says they can do.
I am glad to say that SB 2023-1316 died in committee. Same for HB 2023-0991. Lots of other stupid stuff from Tallahassee this year, of course, and astute observers may see that Tally is not that far from Chattahoochee.
This Pope got some serious legal writing chops. That means, clearly written such that even the nincompoops at WC may actually come to understand that they are being shits, here. Thanks for a good share, Kenneth. And, welcome to the Kenneth Club.
A question about (that great response letter) - is there an important procedural reason to send that response? In other words, could you have simply told the client "You can ignore this garbage threat" or does the response serve you in the event that they did bring a legal action against the client? Or in your experience does the legal bullying continue if they don't get a written smackdown?
One of the very telling things in that LAT article: Oubre's background is in business admin. We're seeing a lot of these business types come in and try to apply business ethics to academia. It ... tends not to go well.
Your letter is so delightful to read that it causes me to almost regret the fact that as a Canadian, I am unlikely to ever have anyone try to intimidate me by misstating American law.
So, sadly, I will never be able to enjoy the sadistic pleasure of having such a letter written on my behalf. My life is very slightly the poorer for it
Beautifully written letter! However, I was more intrigued by the statements in your cover essay, specifically "a system that is completely unaffordable and incomprehensible to most Americans." That's a very serious indictment of the entire framework of our country. You might like to add "glacially slow," just to complete the picture. Later you observe that "We need to create accessible resources...," a statement that should apply to much more of the law than just free speech. The entire legal system is unapproachable and fear of any encounter prevents far too many people from pursuing their rights.
Ditto for a desperate need for better assistance for Domestic Violence and Child Custody litigants. The County is already ferociously handling Child Support - they should add Spousal Support!
People have complained about the opacity, complexity, slowness and expense of the legal system, and lawyers' perverse incentive to keep it that way, since the beginning of time.
In this specific area of free speech, are there any feasible proposals to mitigate the chilling effect of this kind of bullying?
I know you say that commenting publicly about ongoing legal proceedings can be fraught, especially for legal counsel, but the phrase "beat them incontinent with California's anti-SLAPP statute" had to be said.
It's the sharp, biting commentary that we're here for from Ken.
Thank you for taking this case, and for publicizing it. Keep up the good fight.
As a result of this case, and Whittier's actions, I am stopping all planned donations to Whittier College, until such time as Whittier publicly apologizes, and repudiates all individuals associated with this censorious behavior.
Does this statement qualify as "conduct that undermines President Oubre’s reputation, authority and position"? Could it provoke a claim of "personal liability under the Unruh Civil Rights Act"? I will stipulate that I intend "to create a hostile work environment for President Oubre and to undermine her authority and position", although this is not my sole purpose.
Beautiful. Had a real “Cleveland Browns you should be aware some asshole is signing your name” energy to. It.
Here in the Free State of Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Republican-controlled legislature are pushing an agenda to make it easier for public officials to sue for defamation. Also included is a provision that would treat anonymously sourced information as inherently false. While this is aimed at the news media, there are also proposals to apply it to bloggers and others posting online. Bloggers would be required to register with the state and to disclose the sources of any payments they might receive. BTW, those pushing these proposals have made it clear the goal is to get a case to the Supreme Court and have New York Time v. Sullivan overturned.
Your posting is important for all to read and understand. As has been said by JVL...the residents of the Free State of Florida are free to do whatever Governor DeSantis says they can do.
I am glad to say that SB 2023-1316 died in committee. Same for HB 2023-0991. Lots of other stupid stuff from Tallahassee this year, of course, and astute observers may see that Tally is not that far from Chattahoochee.
Would it be possible to enact a federal anti-SLAPP statute?
How tempting is it to end letters like that wtih 'no, govern *yourselves* accordingly'?
<me reading Popehat's letter to Whittier counsel> : "Ken chose violence."
This Pope got some serious legal writing chops. That means, clearly written such that even the nincompoops at WC may actually come to understand that they are being shits, here. Thanks for a good share, Kenneth. And, welcome to the Kenneth Club.
This was a very satisfying read
A question about (that great response letter) - is there an important procedural reason to send that response? In other words, could you have simply told the client "You can ignore this garbage threat" or does the response serve you in the event that they did bring a legal action against the client? Or in your experience does the legal bullying continue if they don't get a written smackdown?
And now "Vexatious Legal Thuggery" is the name of my new metal band.
You beat me to it by about 30 seconds.
I’ll take “Bumptious Demand” for my folk (bluegrass?) band.
I thought my signature was bad (it's pretty embarrassing), but yours is something else.
Yeah, mine looks pretty damn legible in comparison to Ken’s.
One of the very telling things in that LAT article: Oubre's background is in business admin. We're seeing a lot of these business types come in and try to apply business ethics to academia. It ... tends not to go well.
Same for medicine
Your are so exceedingly good at being mean to people who deserve it. Golf clap.
Your letter is so delightful to read that it causes me to almost regret the fact that as a Canadian, I am unlikely to ever have anyone try to intimidate me by misstating American law.
So, sadly, I will never be able to enjoy the sadistic pleasure of having such a letter written on my behalf. My life is very slightly the poorer for it